Back to Blog
Comparisons

AVIF vs JPEG XL 2026: Next-Gen Formats Battle [Benchmark]

AVIF vs JPEG XL comparison: browser support, compression, speed. See which next-gen format to use. Detailed benchmarks →

January 4, 202512 min read
AVIF vs JPEG XL 2026: Next-Gen Formats Battle [Benchmark] - AVIF.expert

The Next-Gen Format Wars

AVIF and JPEG XL represent the two most promising candidates to replace JPEG as the web's dominant image format. Each brings unique strengths to the table.

AVIF, backed by tech giants Google, Apple, Netflix, and Amazon through the Alliance for Open Media, leverages AV1 video codec technology. Its focus on streaming video applications translates into excellent lossy compression.

JPEG XL, developed by the Joint Photographic Experts Group (the creators of original JPEG), was designed from the ground up as a universal image format. It aims to handle every use case from web delivery to professional photography.

Technical Comparison

A detailed look at the technical capabilities of each format.

FeatureAVIFJPEG XL
Max dimensions65536 x 655361 billion x 1 billion
Bit depth8, 10, 12-bitUp to 32-bit
Lossless compressionGoodExcellent
Lossy compressionExcellentExcellent
Progressive decodingLimitedExcellent
JPEG transcodingNoYes (lossless)
AnimationYesYes

Browser Support Reality

This is where the comparison becomes decisive for web developers.

  • AVIF Support: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge—93% global coverage. Mature and stable.
  • JPEG XL Support: Safari only as of 2025. Chrome removed support in 2023, Firefox never added it.
  • The Practical Impact: Despite JPEG XL's technical advantages, AVIF's browser support makes it the only viable choice for most web applications today.

💡 Pro Tip

The browser support situation may evolve, but for production web projects in 2025, AVIF is the practical choice.

Making Your Choice

Guidelines for choosing between these formats.

  • Web Publishing: AVIF. No contest given current browser support.
  • Image Archives: JPEG XL's lossless JPEG transcoding is valuable. Consider for archival workflows.
  • Professional Photography: JPEG XL offers advantages, but limited software support remains a barrier.
  • Future-proofing: Support both formats where possible. The landscape may shift.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is JPEG XL better than AVIF?â–¼
Technically, JPEG XL has some advantages (progressive decode, JPEG transcoding). Practically, AVIF's browser support makes it more useful for web today.
Why did Chrome remove JPEG XL support?â–¼
Google cited low adoption and the need to maintain code complexity. The decision remains controversial in the developer community.
Should I wait for JPEG XL support?â–¼
For current web projects, use AVIF. You can add JPEG XL support later if browser adoption improves.

Ready to Convert Your Images?

Try our free AVIF converter - no upload required, 100% private.

Start Converting

Related Articles